Page 7 - 2015_01_HelloKakis
P. 7
GOLF ARTICLE 07

















READ SPEED IN CONCLUSION N
Through this research, we learned that:arch, we leararrrrnnenenennn dddd thththttt at:
Predicting the behavior of Consistently delivering • Aim from 6 feet is very diffi cult is very ddidiiiiffiffiffiffififfificcccccculultt
the ball based on the golfer’s the ball into the cup while
x.80%)
putting strategy and learning adjusting to a variety of for many (Approx.80%)
the rules of the green surface green speeds • Aim creates a “Bias” in a Bias” in aa
(Aim Point)
number of Stroke Parameters
ke Parametettererss
• Stroke Parameters are different ers are different
for each Aim Bias as

• “Biases” in the Stroke Parameters Stroke Parameteereererrererssssss
t in the motion oof fffff ththtthhhhhhhttt
are most evident in the motion of the ee e e ee eeeee
ost Impact Interrvvalslslssllslsss”””””””
“Forward and Post Impact Intervals”
• On 19 out of 22 putting variables captured,
• Straight Aimers had a smaller standard had a smaller sstanndadaddadddarrdd
consistency improved
of 22 putting vaariababbbbbbblell
deviation in 18 of 22 putting variables ss
 Average variable improvement of
chosen for this particular study
particular study
38% reduction in standard deviation
• Left Aimers tend to manipulate d to manipulate
rise angle
• On 3 of 22 putting variables captured, consistency the face and/or rise angle
decreased by small amount  80% face change- openingange- opening
 Increase in standard deviation of less than 15% • Right Aimers tend to manipulate the path nd to manipulatteeeeeeeee ttttththt e pathhh
r rate of rotatiiononononoononon
direction and/ or rate of rotation
 10°/s higher rate of rotationrate of rotattiioioioiooonnnn
• Only 3% of the entire sample had zero Face entire sampmpmpmpllele had zero FFaacee
• Performance improved
Change (0.0) between Address and Impact
etween AAAdddddd ress and Impaacact
 With personal putter, subjects sunk
11% of their putts • Less than 2% of the entire sample had a f the entittire sample had aa
(0.0) Face Angle at Impppaaca
 With fi tted putter, subjects sunk 20% of their putts perfectly square (0.0) Face Angle at Impact tt

ected, we reached the
From the data collected, we reached the
on linking your aim bias andndnd
following conclusion linking your aim bias and
your putting method.
od.
• Aim Bias creates path biass path bias
• Aim Bias creates face rotation problemss face rotation problemmssss

25% 60% • Aim Bias affects speed patterns s speed patterns
arget
to get to different lines
nt lines
• Aim Bias affects green readings green reading
15%
• Aim Bias destroys the processes ys the processes
of visualization
70% RIGHT EYE DOMINANT
• Aim Bias plain and simple creates confusionand simple creates confusion
63% aimed left
28%
55% 23% 63%
23% aimed right
17% 13%
13% aimed straight In the next few sessions, we will discuss about the sions, we will discuss about the
four skills of putting. For more discussion, please g. For more discussion, please
contact a professional f tter at Wiz Golf (6570 onal f tter at Wiz Golf (6570
1876 or enquiry@wizgolf.com.sg)wizgolf.com.sg)
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10